|
Post by Lensman on Mar 19, 2007 5:14:48 GMT 1
Am I the only person who thinks this is waaaay too glossy and professionally done to work properly as a parody? Since when did a parody have better FX than the subject of it's humour? Is there a rule that says it shouldn't? My local group thought "Galaxy Quest" was one of the best films of its year, and its FX were light-years better than Classic Trek, which was what it was parodying! Never give up-- Never surrender!
|
|
|
Post by Scifishocks on Mar 19, 2007 9:43:46 GMT 1
Hey just an observation, that's all. I didn't say it was rubbish or anything. Tsk.
|
|