Ashe Raven
Been Here a while!
Peace on Earth? Bwhahahahahahah!
Posts: 109
|
Post by Ashe Raven on Mar 9, 2007 17:16:13 GMT 1
Well I have seen the documentry and putting aside Cameron's clims the findings are very very interesting and now it's time for me to pay yet anothe rvisit to the Holy Land. Of coures I want to point out that the DNA evidence does not prove the man was Jesus, but that the second Mary and the the Jesus in this tomb were not related genetically, which means she was probably married to Jesus or one of the brothers in the tomb. But then there is the find of Judah son of Jesus also found in the tomb
I love this field of work, I'd like to look deeper into this. I'll let you know what I find
|
|
|
Post by Lensman on Mar 12, 2007 5:02:53 GMT 1
the DNA evidence does not prove the man was Jesus, but that the second Mary and the the Jesus in this tomb were not related genetically, which means she was probably married to Jesus or one of the brothers in the tomb. Assuming the DNA evidence hasn't been faked as other evidence has, all it proves is that the female wasn't a blood relation of the male. Saying she was married to one of the males buried there is a good *guess*, but it's only a guess. There are other possibilities, such as a friend being buried in the family tomb. After all, that's what the Gospels say happened to Jesus' body-- he was buried in a friend's tomb.
|
|